tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1629078056775347278.post1458746552888345016..comments2008-01-21T04:40:45.558-08:00Michael Henaghanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09881685710769034631noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1629078056775347278.post-80218529652027181182008-01-21T04:40:00.000-08:002008-01-21T04:40:00.000-08:00well I can sympathise, 128 quality, if it is that, actually adds to the digital manipulation, I had no idea they were of such low quality however. They do sound better in a higher bitrate I agree, mainly because higher bitrate allow speakers to fully utilise what is there rather than what the lost "lossy" parts. I shall see.<BR/><BR/>EricAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1629078056775347278.post-81639878652932327082008-01-12T07:20:00.000-08:002008-01-12T07:20:00.000-08:00;-)<BR/>i thought about it ....kin'kønoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1629078056775347278.post-90432424942017340052008-01-11T05:39:00.000-08:002008-01-11T05:39:00.000-08:00well that would defeat the purpose of this release. It is supposed to sound degraded, devoid of digital manipulation and as if it was recorded in another era.Micky67http://www.blogger.com/profile/09881685710769034631noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1629078056775347278.post-52919674775680093262008-01-10T18:37:00.000-08:002008-01-10T18:37:00.000-08:00i like it very much !<BR/>but should you upload these tracks in a better bitrate (192 or 256 kbps) ?kin'kønoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1629078056775347278.post-14035126833370632342008-01-07T08:24:00.000-08:002008-01-07T08:24:00.000-08:00Thanks for taking the time out to listen!Micky67http://www.blogger.com/profile/09881685710769034631noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1629078056775347278.post-12101880944690792832008-01-07T00:25:00.000-08:002008-01-07T00:25:00.000-08:00downloaded Ondes pieces & love them. great work. best wishes, murmuristsmurmuristshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10261395012511896545noreply@blogger.com